April 1 is the submission deadline for the IPM Enhancement Grants Request for Applications released last week. Here is some general advice for those preparing proposals:
- Follow the RFA closely in constructing your proposal. Make it easy on the reviewers (who are reviewing and comparing many proposals) to follow along, to find everything required, and to find those things in expected places.
- Address all of the scoring criteria shown on worksheet in the back of the RFA. These criteria vary somewhat for each project type. For a Capstone project, for instance:
- Resource building, etc. (builds on what you’ve already done)
- Regional importance (How many states, farms, acres, people could be positively impacted? Have stakeholders identified this issue as a priority?)
- Potential for success
- Impact evaluation (see #4 below)
- Proposal prep (see #1)
- Budget
- This year the RFA has “special priorities”. If your project fits one of them, then use it. Even if your project isn’t t chosen to address one of the priorities, it will still be in the competition with all other proposals for the other half (nearly) of available funding.
- Look closely at the Impact evaluation requirement. In addition to the traditional “plan to measure project outcomes and impacts of this project”, you have the option of broadly contributing to the status of impact data in this field. For instance, maybe the project could include a survey of targeted stakeholders for their current practices or understanding of pest ID, providing baseline data that goes beyond your own project? (More to come in a future post on this.)
I hope this helps. Feel free to contact me if you have other questions.
Jim VanKirk, Director SIPMC
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »