• Southern IPM blog posts

    February 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan    
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728

IPM Centers a No-Show in the President’s 2011 Budget

President Obama’s USDA budget for fiscal year 2011 was released early this week, and does not contain any request for the Integrated Research, Education, and Extension Competitive Grants Program (Section 406). This program, often abbreviated as “Section 406″, has been the funding source for several major IPM programs, including Regional IPM Centers, Crops at Risk (CAR), Risk Avoidance and Mitigation Program (RAMP), and the Methyl Bromide Transitions (MBT) program.

Regional IPM Centers  have been funded since 2000 at almost $4 million annually (a little under $1 million per Center). Funding comes at the end of the fiscal year, so FY 2010 funds have not yet been distributed to the four IPM Centers and are expected to support existing Centers until September 2011.

Several times in recent years the President’s budget has included a proposal to move Section 406 out of it’s current place in the Plant and Animal Systems budget into the National Research Initiative (NRI). Each time in the past Congressional action resulted in restoration of Section 406 into its original funding area. The federal budget is not complete until Congress passes a bill that is signed by the President, so a lot can change. One of 3 potential outcomes seems likely,  and two of them bode well for continued funding:

  1. Section 406 could be moved in some way into the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) budget. AFRI is the new name for NRI. I have been told – informally – that this is the plan at USDA.
  2. Section 406 could be restored to it’s original budget line.
  3. The programs currently funded by Section 406 could be eliminated from the Federal budget.

IPM programs represent a relative small part of Section 406 funds. Other programs funded under Section 406 include  National Integrated Water Quality Program (NIWQP), Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP), and National Integrated Food Safety Initiative (NIFSI). The most recent enacted budget I can easily find shows FY 2009 enacted and the FY 2010 USDA request.

University Extension takes a hit nationwide

As states continue to struggle with tight budgets, one of the casualties is often state University Extension programs. Delta Farm Press editorial director Hembree Brandon explains how, in several states, Extension specialists are leaving universities for the private sector, and universities are favoring high dollar research grants at the expense of small Extension budgets. Can research and extension afford to be mutually exclusive? Click here to read the article.

Researchers Find Foe for Small Hive Beetle

In the winter issue of Southern Exposure, you’ll find a story about a relatively new pest that has been “bugging” bees in the southeast. The pest, the small hive beetle, is too small for the eye to see, but big enough to bully entire colonies into leaving their nests.

Read more »

School Environmental Protection Act: What does it mean for school IPM?

The blog post below was written by Mike Merchant, urban entomologist at Texas AgriLife Extension Service, in response to the recent introduction of H.R. 4159: the School Environmental Protection Act.  Those who are not familiar with the bill can click here to read it. The bill seeks to reduce or eliminate pesticide use in schools. The bill has both its proponents and its critics.

Read more »

A Tale of Unintended Consequences

In a small niche of the forests of China, Korea and Japan, the Asian longhorned beetle evolved unnoticed. A hardwood tree pest with a black and white specked abdomen and long antennae, it survived in a pocket of hardwood trees amidst a largely evergreen Asian forest. Because the longhorned beetle feeds on the heartwood of hardwood trees only, the beetles’ populations remained low.

Read more »

Does invasive always mean “bad”?

A post on Slate.com by Rebecca Tuhus-Dubrow might be a good starting point to consider a discussion of whether invasive species are always necessarily undesirable. Don’t Sweat the Invasion -Why foreign plants and animals may not be that bad Read more »

Cogongrass: Another classic invader

USA Today’s Marty Roney writes about cogongrass in today’s article Weeds threaten wildlife and create fire hazard in Deep South. Note the classic invasive species attributes of this story: introduced unwittingly, no natural controls in the new habitat, displacement and disruption.

Regional IPM Center Competitive Accounts 4: North Central IPM Center

Fourth in a series discussion how the four Regional IPM Centers fund projects. The North Central IPM Center is the only one that has not funded State Contacts or comparable projects at all for several years. Read more »

One Person’s Beautiful Plant; Another’s Invasive Nightmare

Although the distinctive sweet scents of honeysuckle and wisteria have always assured me that spring is on its way, by midsummer I find myself battling them in my backyard. While some people welcome these plants, and others with similar growth habits, neither of the plants is native to the United States, and in most cases, are considered invasive pests.

Read more »

Regional IPM Center Competitive Accounts 3: Northeastern IPM Center

Third in a series discussion how the four Regional IPM Centers fund projects.

Read more »